draft-reschke-http-jfv-09.txt		draft-reschke-http-jfv-latest.txt
	Network Working Group J. Reschke		Network Working Group J. Reschke
	Internet-Draft greenbytes		Internet-Draft greenbytes
	Intended status: Standards Track July 2, 2018		Intended status: Standards Track October 11, 2018
	Expires: January 3, 2019		Expires: April 14, 2019
	A JSON Encoding for HTTP Header Field Values		A JSON Encoding for HTTP Header Field Values
	draft-reschke-http-jfv-09		draft-reschke-http-jfv-latest
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document establishes a convention for use of JSON-encoded field		This document establishes a convention for use of JSON-encoded field
	values in HTTP header fields.		values in HTTP header fields.
	Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor before publication)		Editorial Note
			This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
	Distribution of this document is unlimited. Although this is not a		Distribution of this document is unlimited. Although this is not a
	work item of the HTTPbis Working Group, comments should be sent to		work item of the HTTPbis Working Group, comments should be sent to
	the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) mailing list at ietf-http-		the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) mailing list at ietf-http-
	wg@w3.org [1], which may be joined by sending a message with subject		wg@w3.org [1], which may be joined by sending a message with subject
	"subscribe" to ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org [2].		"subscribe" to ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org [2].
	Discussions of the HTTPbis Working Group are archived at		Discussions of the HTTPbis Working Group are archived at
	<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/>.		<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/>.
	XML versions and latest edits for this document are available from		XML versions and latest edits for this document are available from
	<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#draft-reschke-http-jfv>.		<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#draft-reschke-http-jfv>.
	The changes in this draft are summarized in Appendix E.12.		The changes in this draft are summarized in Appendix E.13.
	Status of This Memo		Status of This Memo
	This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the		This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
	provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.		provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on January 3, 2019.		This Internet-Draft will expire on April 14, 2019.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 2, line 49 ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line 49 ¶
	A.1. Content-Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10		A.1. Content-Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
	A.2. Content-Disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10		A.2. Content-Disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
	A.3. WWW-Authenticate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11		A.3. WWW-Authenticate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
	A.4. Accept-Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12		A.4. Accept-Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
	Appendix B. Use of JSON Field Value Encoding in the Wild . . . . 13		Appendix B. Use of JSON Field Value Encoding in the Wild . . . . 13
	B.1. W3C Reporting API Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14		B.1. W3C Reporting API Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	B.2. W3C Clear Site Data Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . 14		B.2. W3C Clear Site Data Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	B.3. W3C Feature Policy Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . 14		B.3. W3C Feature Policy Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	Appendix C. Relation to HTTP 'Key' Header Field . . . . . . . . 14		Appendix C. Relation to HTTP 'Key' Header Field . . . . . . . . 14
	Appendix D. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14		Appendix D. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	Appendix E. Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before		Appendix E. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	publication) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
	E.1. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.1. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.2. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.2. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.3. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.3. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.4. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.4. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.5. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.5. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.6. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.6. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.7. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.7. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.8. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15		E.8. Since draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
	E.9. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		E.9. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	E.10. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		E.10. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	E.11. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		E.11. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	E.12. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		E.12. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
			E.13. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16		Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
	1. Introduction		1. Introduction
	Defining syntax for new HTTP header fields ([RFC7230], Section 3.2)		Defining syntax for new HTTP header fields ([RFC7230], Section 3.2)
	is non-trivial. Among the commonly encountered problems are:		is non-trivial. Among the commonly encountered problems are:
	o There is no common syntax for complex field values. Several well-		o There is no common syntax for complex field values. Several well-
	known header fields do use a similarly looking syntax, but it is		known header fields do use a similarly looking syntax, but it is
	skipping to change at page 14, line 8 ¶		skipping to change at page 14, line 8 ¶
	adopted this format. At least one of these moved away after the HTTP		adopted this format. At least one of these moved away after the HTTP
	Working Group decided to focus on [HSTRUCT] (see thread starting at		Working Group decided to focus on [HSTRUCT] (see thread starting at
	<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-		<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-
	wg/2016OctDec/0505.html>).		wg/2016OctDec/0505.html>).
	The sections below summarize the current usage of this format.		The sections below summarize the current usage of this format.
	B.1. W3C Reporting API Specification		B.1. W3C Reporting API Specification
	Defined in W3C Note "Reporting API 1" (Section 3.1 of [REPORTING]).		Defined in W3C Note "Reporting API 1" (Section 3.1 of [REPORTING]).
	Still in use in latest editor copy as of June 2017.		Still in use in latest editor copy as of July 2018.
	B.2. W3C Clear Site Data Specification		B.2. W3C Clear Site Data Specification
	Used in earlier versions of "Clear Site Data". The current version		Used in earlier versions of "Clear Site Data". The current version
	replaces the use of JSON with a custom syntax that happens to be		replaces the use of JSON with a custom syntax that happens to be
	somewhat compatible with an array of JSON strings (see Section 3.1 of		somewhat compatible with an array of JSON strings (see Section 3.1 of
	[CLEARSITE] and <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-		[CLEARSITE] and <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-
	wg/2017AprJun/0214.html> for feedback).		wg/2017AprJun/0214.html> for feedback).
	B.3. W3C Feature Policy Specification		B.3. W3C Feature Policy Specification
	skipping to change at page 14, line 48 ¶		skipping to change at page 14, line 48 ¶
	the benefits of having the same data model for both types of header		the benefits of having the same data model for both types of header
	fields would be gone. A hybrid approach might make sense, as long as		fields would be gone. A hybrid approach might make sense, as long as
	it doesn't require any heuristics on the recipient's side.		it doesn't require any heuristics on the recipient's side.
	Note: a concrete proposal was made by Kazuho Oku in		Note: a concrete proposal was made by Kazuho Oku in
	<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-		<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-
	wg/2016JanMar/0155.html>.		wg/2016JanMar/0155.html>.
	[[CREF1: Use of generic libs vs compactness of field values..]]		[[CREF1: Use of generic libs vs compactness of field values..]]
	Appendix E. Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)		Appendix E. Change Log
			This section is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
	E.1. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-00		E.1. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-00
	Editorial fixes + working on the TODOs.		Editorial fixes + working on the TODOs.
	E.2. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-01		E.2. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-01
	Mention slightly increased risk of smuggling information in header		Mention slightly increased risk of smuggling information in header
	field values.		field values.
	E.3. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-02		E.3. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-02
	skipping to change at page 16, line 31 ¶		skipping to change at page 16, line 31 ¶
	Update JSON and HSTRUCT references.		Update JSON and HSTRUCT references.
	FEATUREPOL doesn't use JSON syntax anymore.		FEATUREPOL doesn't use JSON syntax anymore.
	E.12. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-08		E.12. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-08
	Update HSTRUCT reference.		Update HSTRUCT reference.
	Update notes about CLEARSITE and FEATUREPOL.		Update notes about CLEARSITE and FEATUREPOL.
			E.13. Since draft-reschke-http-jfv-09
			Update note about REPORTING.
	Acknowledgements		Acknowledgements
	Thanks go to the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Working Group		Thanks go to the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Working Group
	participants.		participants.
	Author's Address		Author's Address
	Julian F. Reschke		Julian F. Reschke
	greenbytes GmbH		greenbytes GmbH
	Hafenweg 16		Hafenweg 16
End of changes. 10 change blocks.
	10 lines changed or deleted		19 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.44jr. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/