The identifier is a name for the issue (and is unique within this document).
The type of issue is one of:
The status of the issue is one of:
The reference is an indication of where the issue was first raised.
The description is a succinct overview of the issue.
The resolution describes the specification change that resolves the issue.
|Identifier||Type / Status||Reference and Description||Proposed Resolution / Latest Change|
|email@example.com, 2006-08-10: Umbrella issue for editorial fixes/enhancements.||latest change in revision latest
|Identifier||Type / Status||Reference and Description||Resolution / Latest Change|
|firstname.lastname@example.org, 2006-10-12: Clarify the extension point.||in revision 03:
Clarify that future revisions of this specification may define keywords other than the two defined here, and that the only one specifiying octet-by-octet equivalence is "identity".
email@example.com, 2006-08-10: Roy Fielding points out that it's problematic to introduce new HTTP response headers, as deployed software will treat it as an entity header (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2006JulSep/0031.html and RFC 2616, Section 6.2).
|in revision 01:
Redefine the header so that it can indeed be used as an Entity header.
|firstname.lastname@example.org, 2006-08-20: In draft 00, the presence of extensibility points for the "Entity-Transform" header apparently draws attention away from the more important parts of the draft: analyzing the key problem, and making minimal changes to solve them.||in revision 01:
Header definition completely rewritten (including a reduction in extensibility).
|email@example.com, 2007-07-07: Update RFC2518 references to RFC4918, where appropriate.||in revision 07:
Last change: 2007-07-07