WEBDAV Working GroupJ. Whitehead
Internet-DraftU.C. Santa Cruz
Intended status: Standards TrackG. Clemm
Expires: April 24, 2005IBM
J. Reschke, Editor
greenbytes
October 21, 2004

Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Redirect Reference Resources
draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-10

Note: a later version of this document has been published as RFC4437.

Status of this Memo

This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions of section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2005.

Copyright Notice

Copyright © The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

 I  edit   (type: edit, status: open)
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de2004-10-03 Umbrella issue for editorial changes.
Associated changes in this document: 1, 1, 4, <#rfc.change.edit.4>, del-1, del-1, <#rfc.change.edit.7>, 6, 6, 13.1, B.
 I  old_clients   (type: change, status: open)
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de2003-11-10 There are (at least) two major design goals, but unfortunately both are in direct contradiction:
#1: Maximum consistency with HTTP/1.1 (RFC2616). This means that any request that addresses a redirect reference resource MUST result in a 3xx status code (obviously the whole point is that GET MUST result in a redirection, and if it does, it's hard to say why other methods such as PUT or DELETE should behave differently). Therefore, the redirect reference protocol introduces a new request header ("Apply-To-Redirect-Ref") through which a client can indicate that the request indeed should be applied to the redirect reference resource itself.
#2: Maximum usability with existing clients. For instance, the Microsoft Webfolder client will not be able to DELETE a redirect reference resource unless the server deviates from #1.
Right now I'm not sure about the best way to resolve this. Currently the spec chooses #1 (back when this decision was made, there was probably the assumption that existing clients would quickly be updated -- something that probably isn't true today).
However this may result in implementers either just ignoring these rules, or adding special workarounds based on "User Agent" detection.

This specification defines redirect reference resources. A redirect reference resource is a resource whose default response is an HTTP/1.1 3xx (Redirection) status code (see RFC2616, Section 10.3), redirecting the client to a different resource, the target resource. A redirect reference makes it possible to access the target resource indirectly, through any URI mapped to the redirect reference resource. There are no integrity guarantees associated with redirect reference resources.

Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor before publication)

Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to the Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) working group at <mailto:w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, which may be joined by sending a message with subject "subscribe" to <mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org>. Discussions of the WEBDAV working group are archived at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/>.

An issues list and XML and HTML versions of this draft are available from <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol>.


Table of Contents

Issues list

IdTypeStatusDateRaised By
12.1-property-namechangeclosed2003-10-06julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
3-terminology-redirectrefchangeclosed2003-07-27julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
lc-33-forwardingchangeclosed2000-02-11yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com
lc-36-serverchangeclosed2000-02-11yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com
lc-48-s6changeclosed2000-02-11yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com
lc-57-noautoupdatechangeclosed2000-02-11yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com
lc-58-updatechangeclosed2000-02-11yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com
editeditopen2004-10-03julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
old_clientschangeopen2003-11-10julian.reschke@greenbytes.de

1. Introduction

This specification extends the Web Distributed Authoring Protocol (WebDAV) to enable clients to create new access paths to existing resources. This capability is useful for several reasons:

WebDAV makes it possible to organize HTTP resources into hierarchies, placing them into groupings, known as collections, which are more easily browsed and manipulated than a single flat collection. However, hierarchies require categorization decisions that locate resources at a single location in the hierarchy, a drawback when a resource has multiple valid categories. For example, in a hierarchy of vehicle descriptions containing collections for cars and boats, a description of a combination car/boat vehicle could belong in either collection. Ideally, the description should be accessible from both. Allowing clients to create new URIs that access the existing resource lets them put that resource into multiple collections.

 I  lc-36-server   (type: change, status: closed)
yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com2000-02-11 Servers: Replace "server" with "unrelated system" throughout.
2004-10-06Resolution: Originally proposed resolution: Try replacing "server" with "host" in some contexts, rephrasing in passive voice in others. See also issue 40. Actual resolution: replace or remove on a case-by-case basis; use "system" or "unrelated system" (host in RFC2616 terminology is something different).
Associated changes in this document: 1, 1, 1, 17.1.

Hierarchies also make resource sharing more difficult, since resources that have utility across many collections are still forced into a single collection. For example, the mathematics department at one university might create a collection of information on fractals that contains bindings to some local resources, but also provides access to some resources at other universities. For many reasons, it may be undesirable to make physical copies of the shared resources I  on the local server: to conserve disk space, to respect copyright constraints, or to make any changes in the shared resources visible automatically. Being able to create new access paths to existing resources in other collections or even on other  I serversunrelated systems is useful for this sort of case.

 I  lc-33-forwarding   (type: change, status: closed)
yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com2000-02-11 Forwarding: Replace "forward" with "redirect" throughout.
2004-10-07Resolution: Original Resolution: Use "redirect" for the behavior redirect resources do exhibit. Use "forward" for the contrasting behavior (passing a method on to the target with no client action needed). Define these two terms. See also issue 40. Actual Resolution: change the text so that it always says "redirect" when we mean "redirect" and "forward" when we mean "forward"; do not add new definitions, though.
Associated changes in this document: 1, 3.

The redirect reference resources defined here provide a mechanism for creating alternative access paths to existing resources. A redirect reference resource is a resource in one collection whose purpose is to  I forwardredirect requests to another resource (its target), possibly in a different collection. In this way, it allows clients to submit requests to the target resource from another collection. It redirects most requests to the target resource using a HTTP status code from the 3xx range (Redirection), thereby providing a form of mediated access to the target resource.

A redirect reference is a resource with properties but no body of its own. Properties of a redirect reference resource can contain such information as who created the reference, when, and why. Since redirect reference resources are implemented using HTTP 3xx responses, it generally takes two round trips to submit a request to the intended resource. Redirect references work equally well for local resources and for resources that reside on a different  I serversystem from the reference.

The remainder of this document is structured as follows: Section 3 defines terms that will be used throughout the specification. Section 4 provides an overview of redirect reference resources.  I Section del-1 discusses how to create a redirect reference resource. Section 5 defines the semantics of existing methods when applied to redirect reference resources I , and . Section 6 discusses how to create a redirect reference resource, and Section 7 discusses updating redirect references. Section 8 discusses their semantics when applied to collections that contain redirect reference resources. Sections 9 through 11 discuss several other issues raised by the existence of redirect reference resources. Sections 12 through 15 define the new headers, properties, and XML elements required to support redirect reference resources. Section 16 discusses capability discovery. Sections 17 through 19 present the security, internationalization, and IANA concerns raised by this specification. The remaining sections provide a variety of supporting information.

2. Notational Conventions

Since this document describes a set of extensions to the WebDAV Distributed Authoring Protocol [RFC2518], itself an extension to the HTTP/1.1 protocol, the augmented BNF used here to describe protocol elements is exactly the same as described in Section 2.1 of [RFC2616]. Since this augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in Section 2.2 of [RFC2616], these rules apply to this document as well.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Terminology

The terminology used here follows and extends that in the WebDAV Distributed Authoring Protocol specification [RFC2518]. Definitions of the terms resource, Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), and Uniform Resource Locator (URL) are provided in [RFC2396].

 I  3-terminology-redirectref   (type: change, status: closed)
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de2003-07-27 Consider global rename of "redirect reference resource" to "redirect resource".
2004-10-08Resolution: Retracted (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004OctDec/0009.html).

Redirect Reference Resource

Non-Reference Resource

Target Resource

This document uses the terms "precondition", "postcondition" and "protected property" as defined in [RFC3253]. Servers MUST report pre-/postcondition failures as described in section 1.6 of this document.

4. Overview of Redirect Reference Resources

For all operations submitted to a redirect reference resource, the default response is a 302 (Found), accompanied by the Redirect-Ref header (defined in Section 12.1 below) and the Location header set to the URI of the target resource. With this information, the client can resubmit the request to the URI of the target resource.

A redirect reference resource never automatically forwards requests to its target resource. Redirect resources bring the same benefits as links in HTML documents. They can be created and maintained without the involvement or even knowledge of their target resource. This reduces the cost of linking between resources. I "

If the client is aware that it is operating on a redirect reference resource, it can resolve the reference by retrieving the reference resource's DAV:reftarget property (defined in Section 13.2 below), whose value contains the URI of the target resource. It can then submit requests to the target resource.

A redirect reference resource is a new type of resource. To distinguish redirect reference resources from non-reference resources, a new value of the DAV:resourcetype property (defined in [RFC2518]), DAV:redirectref, is defined in Section 14.1 below.

Since a redirect reference resource is a resource, methods can be applied to the reference resource as well as to its target resource. The Apply-To-Redirect-Ref request header (defined in Section 12.2 below) is provided so that referencing-aware clients can control whether an operation is applied to the redirect reference resource or standard HTTP/WebDAV behaviour (redirection with a 3xx status code) should occur. The Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header can be used with most requests to redirect reference resources. This header is particularly useful with PROPFIND, to retrieve the reference resource's own properties.

 I  lc-57-noautoupdate   (type: change, status: closed)
yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com2000-02-11 Add language to forbid servers from automatically updating redirect resources when their targets move.
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de2004-01-05 I don't think we can forbid that. This spec consists of (a) clarifications of how a server that supports redirects should behave for specific WebDAV methods, and (b) extensions to explicitly create them (or to apply a method to the redirect itself). As such, we shouldn't add any requirements that HTTP doesn't add. What we could do is (1) note why auto-update may be a bad idea, and possibly (2) define that redirects created by MKREDIRECTREF should not behave that way (or alternatively define more specific resource types).
2004-10-07Resolution: State that operations on the target of a redirect reference usually will not affect the redirect itself; but also that clients should not rely on that in general (see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004OctDec/0004.html).
 I  

Implementation Note: Operations on the target of a redirect reference usually do not affect the redirect reference itself. However, clients should not rely on this behaviour (for instance, some servers may update redirect references as a result of namespace operations on the reference's target).

 I  

del-1. MKREDIRECTREF Method

The MKREDIRECTREF method requests the creation of a redirect reference resource.

If a MKREDIRECTREF request fails, the server state preceding the request MUST be restored.

Responses from a MKREDIRECTREF request MUST NOT be cached, as MKREDIRECTREF has non-idempotent and non-safe semantics (see [RFC2616], section 9.1). I .

Marshalling:

Preconditions:

Postconditions:

del-2. Example: Creating a Redirect Reference Resource with MKREDIRECTREF

>> Request:

MKREDIRECTREF /~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<D:mkredirectref xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:reftarget>
    <D:href>/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08.txt</D:href>
  </D:reftarget>
</D:mkredirectref>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 201 Created

This request resulted in the creation of a new redirect reference resource at http://www.example.com/~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref, which points to the resource identified by the DAV:reftarget property. In this example, the target resource is identified by the URI http://www.example.com/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08.txt. The redirect reference resource's DAV:resourcetype property is set to DAV:redirectref and it's DAV:redirect-lifetime property has the value DAV:temporary.

5. Operations on Redirect Reference Resources

 I  lc-48-s6   (type: change, status: closed)
yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com2000-02-11 Replace all of section 6 with just this: A redirect resource, upon receiving a request without an Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header, MUST respond with a 302 (Found) response. The 302 (Found) response MUST include a location header identifying the target and a Redirect-Ref header. If a redirect resource receives a request with an Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header then the redirect reference resource MUST apply the method to itself rather than blindly returning a 302 (Found) response.
2004-10-06Resolution: Original resolution: Keep a summary along the lines of Yaron's proposal (don't use the word "blindly"). Keep the bullets detailing the headers to be returned. Delete the rest, including the examples. See also issue 28, 29, 30, 31, 32. Actual resolution: the current wording seems to be in line with what Yaron proposed back in 2000.

Although non-referencing-aware clients cannot create reference resources, they should be able to submit requests through the reference resources created by reference-aware WebDAV clients. They should be able to follow any references to their targets. To make this possible, a server that receives any request made via a redirect reference resource MUST return a 3xx range (Redirection) status code, unless the request includes an Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header specifying "T". The client and server MUST follow [RFC2616] Section 10.3, but with these additional rules:

A reference-aware WebDAV client can, like a non-referencing client, resubmit the request to the URI in the Location header in order to operate on the target resource. Alternatively, it can resubmit the request to the URI of the redirect reference resource with the "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" header in order to operate on the reference resource itself. In this case, the request MUST be applied to the reference resource itself, and a 3xx response MUST NOT be returned.

As redirect references do not have bodies, GET and PUT requests with "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" MUST fail with status 403 (forbidden).

 I  

6. MKREDIRECTREF Method

The MKREDIRECTREF method requests the creation of a redirect reference resource.

If a MKREDIRECTREF request fails, the server state preceding the request MUST be restored.

Responses from a MKREDIRECTREF request MUST NOT be cached, as MKREDIRECTREF has non-idempotent and non-safe semantics (see [RFC2616], section 9.1). I .

Marshalling:

Preconditions:

Postconditions:

6.1 Example: Creating a Redirect Reference Resource with MKREDIRECTREF

>> Request:

MKREDIRECTREF /~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<D:mkredirectref xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:reftarget>
    <D:href>/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08.txt</D:href>
  </D:reftarget>
</D:mkredirectref>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 201 Created

This request resulted in the creation of a new redirect reference resource at http://www.example.com/~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref, which points to the resource identified by the DAV:reftarget property. In this example, the target resource is identified by the URI http://www.example.com/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08.txt. The redirect reference resource's DAV:resourcetype property is set to DAV:redirectref and it's DAV:redirect-lifetime property has the value DAV:temporary.

 I  lc-58-update   (type: change, status: closed)
yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com2000-02-11 There needs to be a way to update the target of a redirect reference.
2004-10-19Resolution: Agreed. See also issues 6, 43. See new method UPDATEREDIRECTREF.
Associated changes in this document: <#rfc.change.lc-58-update.1>.
 I  

7. UPDATEREDIRECTREF Method

The UPDATEREDIRECTREF method requests the update of a redirect reference resource.

If a UPDATEREDIRECTREF request fails, the server state preceding the request MUST be restored.

Responses from a UPDATEREDIRECTREF request MUST NOT be cached, as UPDATEREDIRECTREF has non-safe semantics (see [RFC2616], section 9.1).

Marshalling:

Preconditions:

Postconditions:

7.1 Example: Updating a Redirect Reference Resource with UPDATEREDIRECTREF

>> Request:

UPDATEREDIRECTREF /~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<D:updateredirectref xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:reftarget>
    <D:href>/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08b.txt</D:href>
  </D:reftarget>
</D:updateredirectref>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

This request has updated the redirect reference's DAV:reftarget property to "/i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08b.txt", and has not changed the DAV:redirect-lifetime value. Note that the "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref" request header must be used, otherwise the request would result in a redirect (3xx) response status.

8. Operations on Collections That Contain Redirect Reference Resources

Consistent with the rules in Section 5, the response for each redirect reference encountered while processing a collection MUST be a 3xx (Redirection) unless a "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" header is included with the request. The overall response will therefore be a 207 (Multi-Status). For each DAV:response element representing a redirect reference, the server MUST include an additional DAV:location element, specifying the value of the "Location" header that would be returned otherwise. The extension is defined in Section 15 below.

The Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header (defined in Section 12.2) MAY be used with any request on a collection. If present, it will be applied to all redirect reference resources encountered while processing the collection.

8.1 LOCK on a Collection That Contains Redirect References

An attempt to lock (with Depth: infinity) a collection that contains redirect references without specifying "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" will always fail. The Multi-Status response will contain a 3xx response for each redirect reference.

Reference-aware clients can lock the collection by using Apply-To-Redirect-Ref, and, if desired, lock the targets of the redirect references individually.

Non-referencing clients must resort to locking each resource individually.

8.2 Example: PROPFIND on a Collection with Redirect Reference Resources

Suppose a PROPFIND request with Depth: infinity is submitted to the following collection, with the members shown here:

/MyCollection/
     (non-reference resource) diary.html
     (redirect reference resource) nunavut

>> Request:

PROPFIND /MyCollection/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Depth: infinity
Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: F
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV: ">
  <D:prop xmlns:J="http://example.com/jsprops/">
    <D:resourcetype/>
    <J:keywords/>
  </D:prop>
</D:propfind>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:J="http://example.com/jsprops/">
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype><D:collection/></D:resourcetype>
        <J:keywords>diary, interests, hobbies</J:keywords>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/diary.html</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype/>
        <J:keywords>diary, travel, family, history</J:keywords>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/nunavut</D:href>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 302 Found</D:status>
    <D:location> 
      <D:href>http://example.ca/art/inuit/</D:href>
    </D:location>
  </D:response>
</D:multistatus>

In this example the Depth header is set to infinity, and the Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header is set to "F". The collection contains one URI that identifies a redirect reference resource. The response element for the redirect reference resource has a status of 302 (Found), and includes a DAV:location extension element to allow clients to retrieve the properties of its target resource. (The response element for the redirect reference resource does not include the requested properties. The client can submit another PROPFIND request to the URI in the DAV:location pseudo-property to retrieve those properties.)

8.3 Example: PROPFIND with Apply-To-Redirect-Ref on a Collection with Redirect Reference Resources

Suppose a PROPFIND request with "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" and Depth: infinity is submitted to the following collection, with the members shown here:

/MyCollection/
     (non-reference resource) diary.html
     (redirect reference resource) nunavut

>> Request:

PROPFIND /MyCollection/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Depth: infinity
Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:prop>
    <D:resourcetype/>
    <D:reftarget/>
    <D:redirect-lifetime/>
  </D:prop>
</D:propfind>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype><D:collection/></D:resourcetype>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:reftarget/>
        <D:redirect-lifetime/>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/diary.html</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype/>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:reftarget/>
        <D:redirect-lifetime/>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/nunavut</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype><D:redirectref/></D:resourcetype>
        <D:reftarget>
          <D:href>http://example.ca/art/inuit/</D:href>
        </D:reftarget>
        <D:redirect-lifetime><D:temporary/></D:redirect-lifetime>
      </D:prop>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
</D:multistatus>

Since the "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T" header is present, the response shows the properties of the redirect reference resource in the collection rather than reporting a 302 status.

8.4 Example: COPY on a Collection That Contains a Redirect Reference Resource

Suppose a COPY request is submitted to the following collection, with the members shown:

/MyCollection/
     (non-reference resource) diary.html
     (redirect reference resource) nunavut with target       
                                /Someplace/nunavut.map

>> Request:

COPY /MyCollection/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Depth: infinity
Destination: http://example.com/OtherCollection/

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/nunavut</D:href>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 302 Found</D:status>
    <D:location> 
      <D:href>http://example.com//Someplace/nunavut.map</D:href>
    </D:location>
  </D:response>
</D:multistatus>

In this case, since /MyCollection/nunavut is a redirect reference resource, the COPY operation was only a partial success. The redirect reference resource was not copied, but a 302 response was returned for it. So the resulting collection is as follows:

/OtherCollection/
      (non-reference resource) diary.html

8.5 Example: LOCK on a Collection That Contains a Redirect Reference Resource

Suppose a LOCK request is submitted to the following collection, with the members shown:

/MyCollection/
     (non-reference resource) diary.html
     (redirect reference resource) nunavut

>> Request:

LOCK /MyCollection/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: F
Content-Type: text/xml

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:lockinfo xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:lockscope><D:exclusive/></D:lockscope>
  <D:locktype><D:write/></D:locktype>
</D:lockinfo>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: nnnn

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="Dav:">
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/</D:href>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 424 Failed Dependency</D:status>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/diary.html</D:href>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 424 Failed Dependency</D:status>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/MyCollection/nunavut</D:href>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 302 Found</D:status>
    <D:location>
      <D:href>http://example.ca/art/inuit/</D:href>
    </D:location>
  </D:response>
</D:multistatus>

The server returns a 302 response code for the redirect reference resource in the collection. Consequently, neither the collection nor any of the resources identified by its internal member URIs were locked. A referencing-aware client can submit a separate LOCK request to the URI in the DAV:location element returned for the redirect reference resource, and can resubmit the LOCK request with the Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header to the collection. At that point both the reference resource and its target resource will be locked (as well as the collection and all the resources identified by its other members).

9. Operations on Targets of Redirect Reference Resources

Operations on targets of redirect reference resources have no effect on the reference resource.

10. Relative URIs in DAV:reftarget

The URI in the href in a DAV:reftarget property MAY be a relative URI. In this case, the base URI to be used for resolving the relative URI to absolute form is the URI used in the HTTP message to identify the redirect reference resource to which the DAV:reftarget property belongs.

When DAV:reftarget appears in the context of a Multi-Status response, it is in a DAV:response element that contains a single DAV:href element. The value of this DAV:href element serves as the base URI for resolving a relative URI in DAV:reftarget. The value of DAV:href may itself be relative, in which case it must be resolved first in order to serve as the base URI for the relative URI in DAV:reftarget. If the DAV:href element is relative, its base URI is constructed from the scheme component "http", the value of the Host header in the request, and the request-URI.

10.1 Example: Resolving a Relative URI in a Multi-Status Response

>> Request:

PROPFIND /geog/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Apply-To-Redirect-Ref: T
Depth: 1
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:prop>
    <D:resourcetype/>
    <D:reftarget/>
  </D:prop>
</D:propfind>

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1/0" ?>
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:">
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/geog/</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype><D:collection/></D:resourcetype>
      </D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop><D:reftarget/></D:prop>
      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
  <D:response>
    <D:href>/geog/stats.html</D:href>
    <D:propstat>
      <D:prop>
        <D:resourcetype><D:redirectref/></D:resourcetype>
        <D:reftarget>
          <D:href>statistics/population/1997.html</D:href>
        </D:reftarget>
      </D:prop>
    <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
    </D:propstat>
  </D:response>
</D:multistatus>

In this example, the relative URI statistics/population/1997.html is returned as the value of reftarget for the reference resource identified by href /geog/stats.html. The href is itself a relative URI, which resolves to http://example.com/geog/stats.html. This is the base URI for resolving the relative URI in reftarget. The absolute URI of reftarget is http://example.com/geog/statistics/population/1997.html.

11. Redirect References to Collections

In a Request-URI /segment1/segment2/segment3, any of the three segments may identify a redirect reference resource. (See [RFC2396], Section 3.3, for definitions of "path" and "segment".) If any segment in a Request-URI identifies a redirect reference resource, the response SHOULD be a 3xx. The value of the Location header in the response is as follows:

The leftmost path segment of the request-URI that identifies a redirect reference resource, together with all path segments and separators to the left of it, is replaced by the value of the redirect reference resource's DAV:reftarget property (resolved to an absolute URI). The remainder of the request-URI is concatenated to this path.

Note: If the DAV:reftarget property ends with a "/" and the remainder of the Request-URI is non-empty (and therefore must begin with a "/"), the final "/" in the DAV:reftarget property is dropped before the remainder of the Request-URI is appended.

Consider Request-URI /x/y/z.html. Suppose that /x/ is a redirect reference resource whose target resource is collection /a/, which contains redirect reference resource y whose target resource is collection /b/, which contains redirect reference resource z.html whose target resource is /c/d.html.

/x/y/z.html
    |
    | /x -> /a
    |
    v
/a/y/z.html
    |
    | /a/y -> /b
    |
    v
/b/z.html
    |
    | /b/z.html -> /c/d.html
    |
    v
/c/d.html

In this case the client must follow up three separate 3xx responses before finally reaching the target resource. The server responds to the initial request with a 3xx with Location: /a/y/z.html, and the client resubmits the request to /a/y/z.html. The server responds to this request with a 3xx with Location: /b/z.html, and the client resubmits the request to /b/z.html. The server responds to this request with a 3xx with Location: /c/d.html, and the client resubmits the request to /c/d.html. This final request succeeds.

12. Headers

12.1 Redirect-Ref Response Header

Redirect-Ref = "Redirect-Ref:" (absoluteURI | relativeURI)
               ; see sections 3 and 5 of [RFC2396]

The Redirect-Ref header is used in all 3xx responses from redirect reference resources. The value is the (possibly relative) URI of the link target as specified during redirect reference resource creation.

12.2 Apply-To-Redirect-Ref Request Header

Apply-To-Redirect-Ref = "Apply-To-Redirect-Ref" ":" ("T" | "F")

The optional Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header can be used on any request to a redirect reference resource. When it is present and set to "T", the request MUST be applied to the reference resource itself, and a 3xx response MUST NOT be returned.

If the Apply-To-Redirect-Ref header is used on a request to any other sort of resource besides a redirect reference resource, the server MUST ignore it.

13. Redirect Reference Resource Properties

The properties defined below are REQUIRED on redirect reference resources.

13.1 DAV:redirect-lifetime (protected)

This property provides information about the lifetime of a redirect. It can either be DAV:permanent (HTTP status 301) or DAV:temporary (HTTP status 302). Future protocols  I MAYmay define additional values.

<!ELEMENT redirect-lifetime (permanent | temporary)>
<!ELEMENT permanent EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT temporary EMPTY>

13.2 DAV:reftarget (protected)

 I  12.1-property-name   (type: change, status: closed)
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de2003-10-06 Sync names for DAV:reftarget property and "Redirect-Ref" response headers.
2004-10-08Resolution: Retracted (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004OctDec/0010.html).

This property provides an efficient way for clients to discover the URI of the target resource. This is a read-only property after its initial creation. Its value can only be set in a MKREDIRECTREF request. The value is a DAV:href element containing the URI of the target resource.

<!ELEMENT reftarget href >

14. XML Elements

14.1 redirectref XML Element

Name:
redirectref
Namespace:
DAV:
Purpose:
Used as the value of the DAV:resourcetype property to specify that the resource type is a redirect reference resource.
<!ELEMENT redirectref EMPTY >

15. Extensions to the DAV:response XML Element for Multi-Status Responses

As described in Section 8, the DAV:location element may be returned in the DAV:response element of a 207 Multi-Status response, to allow clients to resubmit their requests to the target resource of a redirect reference resource.

Consequently, the definition of the DAV:response XML element changes to the following:

<!ELEMENT response (href, ((href*, status)|(propstat+)),
                    responsedescription?, location?) >
<!ELEMENT location (href) > 

16. Capability Discovery

Sections 9.1 and 15 of [RFC2518] describe the use of compliance classes with the DAV header in responses to OPTIONS, to indicate which parts of the WebDAV Distributed Authoring protocols the resource supports. This specification defines an OPTIONAL extension to [RFC2518]. It defines a new compliance class, called redirectrefs, for use with the DAV header in responses to OPTIONS requests. If a resource does support redirect references, its response to an OPTIONS request may indicate that it does, by listing the new redirectrefs compliance class in the DAV header and by listing the MKREDIRECTREF method as one it supports.

When responding to an OPTIONS request, any type of resource can include redirectrefs in the value of the DAV header. Doing so indicates that the server permits a redirect reference resource at the request URI.

16.1 Example: Discovery of Support for Redirect Reference Resources

>> Request:

OPTIONS /somecollection/someresource HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org

>> Response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Allow: OPTIONS, GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, COPY, MOVE
Allow: MKCOL, PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, LOCK, UNLOCK, MKREDIRECTREF
DAV: 1, 2, redirectrefs

The DAV header in the response indicates that the resource /somecollection/someresource is level 1 and level 2 compliant, as defined in [RFC2518]. In addition, /somecollection/someresource supports redirect reference resources. The Allow header indicates that MKREDIRECTREF requests can be submitted to /somecollection/someresource.

17. Security Considerations

This section is provided to make applications that implement this protocol aware of the security implications of this protocol.

All of the security considerations of HTTP/1.1 and the WebDAV Distributed Authoring Protocol specification also apply to this protocol specification. In addition, redirect reference resources introduce several new security concerns and increase the risk of some existing threats. These issues are detailed below.

17.1 Privacy Concerns

By creating redirect reference resources on a trusted server, it is possible for a hostile agent to induce users to send private information to a target on  I a different serveran unrelated system. This risk is mitigated somewhat, since clients are required to notify the user of the redirection for any request other than GET or HEAD. (See [RFC2616], Section 10.3.3 302 Found.)

17.2 Redirect Loops

Although redirect loops were already possible in HTTP 1.1, the introduction of the MKREDIRECTREF method creates a new avenue for clients to create loops accidentally or maliciously. If the reference resource and its target are on the same server, the server may be able to detect MKREDIRECTREF requests that would create loops. See also [RFC2616], Section 10.3 "Redirection 3xx."

17.3 Redirect Reference Resources and Denial of Service

Denial of service attacks were already possible by posting URLs that were intended for limited use at heavily used Web sites. The introduction of MKREDIRECTREF creates a new avenue for similar denial of service attacks. Clients can now create redirect reference resources at heavily used sites to target locations that were not designed for heavy usage.

17.4 Revealing Private Locations

There are several ways that redirect reference resources may reveal information about collection structures. First, the DAV:reftarget property of every redirect reference resource contains the URI of the target resource. Anyone who has access to the reference resource can discover the collection path that leads to the target resource. The owner of the target resource may have wanted to limit knowledge of this collection structure.

Sufficiently powerful access control mechanisms can control this risk to some extent. Property-level access control could prevent users from examining the DAV:reftarget property. (The Location header returned in responses to requests on redirect reference resources reveals the same information, however.)

This risk is no greater than the similar risk posed by HTML links.

18. Internationalization Considerations

All internationalization considerations mentioned in [RFC2518] also apply to this document.

19. IANA Considerations

All IANA considerations mentioned in [RFC2518] also apply to this document.

20. Contributors

Many thanks to Jason Crawford, Jim Davis, Chuck Fay and Judith Slein who can take credit for big parts of the original design of this specification.

21. Acknowledgements

This document has benefited from thoughtful discussion by Jim Amsden, Peter Carlson, Steve Carter, Tyson Chihaya, Ken Coar, Ellis Cohen, Bruce Cragun, Spencer Dawkins, Mark Day, Rajiv Dulepet, David Durand, Lisa Dusseault, Stefan Eissing, Roy Fielding, Yaron Goland, Fred Hitt, Alex Hopmann, James Hunt, Marcus Jager, Chris Kaler, Manoj Kasichainula, Rohit Khare, Daniel LaLiberte, Steve Martin, Larry Masinter, Jeff McAffer, Joe Orton, Surendra Koduru Reddy, Juergen Reuter, Max Rible, Sam Ruby, Bradley Sergeant, Nick Shelness, John Stracke, John Tigue, John Turner, Kevin Wiggen, and others.

22. Normative References

[RFC2119]Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2396]Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax”, RFC 2396, August 1998.
[RFC2518]Goland, Y., Whitehead, E., Faizi, A., Carter, S., and D. Jensen, “HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring -- WEBDAV”, RFC 2518, February 1999.
[RFC2616]Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1”, RFC 2616, June 1999.
[RFC3253]Clemm, G., Amsden, J., Ellison, T., Kaler, C., and J. Whitehead, “Versioning Extensions to WebDAV (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning)”, RFC 3253, March 2002.

A. Changes to the WebDAV Document Type Definition

<!-- Property Elements from Section 13 -->

<!ELEMENT reftarget href>
<!ELEMENT location href>

<!-- XML Elements from Section 14 -->

<!ELEMENT redirectref EMPTY >

<!-- Changes to the DAV:response Element from Section 15 -->

<!ELEMENT response (href, ((href*, status)|(propstat+)),
                    responsedescription?, location?) >
<!ELEMENT location (href) > 

B. Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)

B.1 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-02

Julian Reschke takes editorial role (added to authors list). Cleanup XML indentation. Start adding all unresolved last call issues. Update some author's contact information. Update references, split into "normative" and "informational". Remove non-RFC2616 headers ("Public") from examples. Fixed width problems in artwork. Start resolving editorial issues.

B.2 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-03

Added Joe Orton and Juergen Reuter to Acknowledgements section. Close more editorial issues. Remove dependencies on BIND spec.

B.3 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-04

More editorial fixes. Clarify that MKRESOURCE can only be used to create redirect references (switch to new method in a future draft). Clarify that redirect references do not have bodies.

B.4 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-05

Close (accept) issue "lc-79-accesscontrol". Add issue "rfc2606-compliance". Close issues "lc-50-blindredirect", "lc-71-relative", "lc-74-terminology". Update contact info for Geoff Clemm. Moved some of the original authors names to new Contributors section. Add and close issue "9-MKRESOURCE-vs-relative-URI". Close issue "lc-72-trailingslash". Close issue "lc-60-ex". Update issue "lc-85-301" with proposal. Close issue "lc-06-reftarget-relative" (9-MKRESOURCE-vs-relative-URI was a duplicate of this one). Also remove section 9.1 (example for MKRESOURCE vs relative URIs). Add and resolve issue "11.2-apply-to-redirect-ref-syntax" (header now has values "T" and "F"). Also some cleanup for "rfc2606-compliance". Typo fixes. Add and resolve "15.1-options-response".

B.5 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-06

Resolve issues "lc-19-direct-ref", "lc-28-lang", "lc-29-lang", "lc-44-pseudo", "lc-53-s10", "lc-61-pseudo", "lc-63-move", "lc-80-i18n" and "rfc2606-compliance". Start work on index. Add new issue "old_clients".

B.6 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-07

Closed issue "lc-38-not-hierarchical". Cleaned up DTD fragments in appendix. Close (reject) issues "lc-55-iana" and "lc-41-no-webdav". Add issue "5_mkresource" and start work on MKREDIRECTREF (issue closed, but more work on MKREDIRECTREF needs to be done for updates and status codes other than 302). Start resolution of "lc-85-301", replacing "302" by more generic language. Update issue "lc-57-noautoupdate". Close issue "lc-37-integrity" (duplicate of "lc-57-autoupdate"). Started work on "lc-85-301". Add L. Dusseault and S. Eissing to Acknowledgments section.

B.7 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-08

Fix index entries for conditions. Open and resolve issue "specify_safeness". Rewrite editorial section and parts of intro. Add more clarifications for issue "lc-85-301" and close it.

 I  

B.8 Since draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-09

Resolve issues "lc-33-forwarding", "lc-36-server" and "lc-57-noautoupdate". Close issues "lc-48-s6", "12.1-property-name", "3-terminology-redirectref" and "lc-58-update". Rearrange section 5 and 6. Add some more terms to index (no change tracking).

Index

A C D H M N P R T U

Authors' Addresses

Jim Whitehead
UC Santa Cruz, Dept. of Computer Science
1156 High Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
US
EMail: ejw@cse.ucsc.edu

Geoff Clemm
IBM
20 Maguire Road
Lexington, MA 02421
US
EMail: geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com

Julian F. Reschke (editor)
greenbytes GmbH
Salzmannstrasse 152
Muenster, NW 48159
Germany
Phone: +49 251 2807760
Fax: +49 251 2807761
EMail: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
URI: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright © The Internet Society (2004).

This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.