httpbis: Ticket #75: RFC2145 Normative
Link: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/75
Origin:
http://www.w3.org/mid/200706182253.l5IMruF9003790@pobox-pa.hpl.hp.com
Component:
p1-messaging
Should RFC2145 references be normative?
Mails
History
: comment added; component, milestone set (Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:03:50 GMT)
-
component
set to auth
-
milestone
set to unassigned
: comment added; component changed (Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:04:27 GMT)
-
component
changed from auth to non-specific.
: comment added; owner set; status, type changed (Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:02:48 GMT)
-
owner
set to fielding@gbiv.com
-
status
changed from new to assigned.
-
type
changed from design to editorial.
It can't be normative -- 2145 is an Informational RFC. IIRC, the text
was supposed to be included in the 2616 revision.
We should check that the text on versions is included (editorial).
: comment added; component changed (Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:47:59 GMT)
-
component
changed from non-specific to p1-messaging.
Related Information
Issues List Index