httpbis: Ticket #56: 6.1.1 can be misread as a complete list

Link:  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/56

Origin:  http://www.w3.org/mid/1168514600.25607.112.camel@henriknordstrom.net

Component: p2-semantics

The second sentence in the first paragraph can on a quick reading be misread as section 10 contains a complete definiton of all possible status codes, where it in reality only has the status codes defined by this RFC.

Mails

• New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes Henrik Nordstrom (hno@squid-cache.org) (2007-01-11)

Associated Checkins

fielding@gbiv.com (Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:29:09 GMT)

[149]: address #56 by focusing on listed codes

History

: comment added (Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:38:48 GMT)

Change "These codes are fully defined in section 10."

Into

"The status codes defined by this RFC is fully defined in section 10."

: comment added; component, milestone set (Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:07:59 GMT)

• component set to semantics
• milestone set to unassigned

: comment added; resolution set; status, milestone changed (Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:29:09 GMT)

• status changed from new to closed.
• resolution set to fixed
• milestone changed from unassigned to 01.

Fixed in [149] by changing to "The status codes listed below are defined in ..."

Related Information

Issues List Index