httpbis: Ticket #51: HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date

Link: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/51

Origin: http://www.w3.org/mid/4587A610.1030005@gmx.de

Component: p1-messaging

Should rfc1123-date BNF be used where the specification calls for something to be a HTTP-date, but only the RFC1123 form? Should separate rules for producing and consuming dates be specified?

Mails

Mails by Sender (Top 10) Mails by Month

RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-18)
- RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-18)
  - Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-19)
    - RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-19)
- Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (hno@squid-cache.org) (2006-12-19)
  - RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-19)
    - NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-19)
      - Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2006-12-20)
        
        Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-20)
        
        Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (hno@squid-cache.org) (2006-12-20)
        
        Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-20)
        
        RE: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-20)
        
        RE: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (hno@squid-cache.org) (2006-12-20)
        
        Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Roy T. Fielding (fielding@gbiv.com) (2006-12-20)
        
        RE: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-21)
        
        RE: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2006-12-21)
- Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-19)
  - RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-19)
    - Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2006-12-19)
      - RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (a-travis@microsoft.com) (2006-12-19)
i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2007-06-19)
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2007-06-19)
  - Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2007-06-19)
    - Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2007-06-19)
      - Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2007-06-19)
        
        Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2007-06-19)
      - Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2007-06-20)
        
        Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom (henrik@henriknordstrom.net) (2007-06-20)
Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net) (2008-04-03)
- Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Frank Ellermann (nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de) (2008-04-03)
- Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 [237] Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2008-04-03)
- Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 [238] Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2008-04-03)
- i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2008-04-03)
  - Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net) (2008-04-08)
    - Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 [239] Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2008-04-09)
- i39, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) (2008-04-03)
  - Re: i39, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net) (2008-04-04)

Associated Checkins

julian.reschke@gmx.de (Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:45:42 GMT): [239]: Resolve #51: make it obvious from the BNF that most of the date formats ...

History

: comment added; component, milestone set (Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:59:38 GMT)

component set to auth
milestone set to unassigned

: comment added; component changed (Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:22:54 GMT)

component changed from auth to messaging.

: comment added; type changed (Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:05:06 GMT)

type changed from design to editorial.

: comment added; resolution set; status changed (Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:45:42 GMT)

status changed from new to closed.
resolution set to fixed

Fixed in [239]:

Resolve #51: make it obvious from the BNF that most of the date formats that must be accepted are indeed obsolete (closes #51).

Related Information

Issues List Index